Interference No. 105,125
Chaffee v. Skulnick
5. Junior party's design application contains sixteen figures, showing various views of
the disclosed design.
6. Senior party's design patent also contains sixteen figures, showing various views of
the disclosed design.
7. The sixteen figures in junior party's design application are identical to the sixteen
figures in the senior party's design patent, with one-to-one correspondence to each other by
figure number.
8. In the specification of the involved application or patent of each party, the written
description of each of the figures is substantively the same as that contained in the specification
of the involved application or patent of the other party, although the precise wording is not the
same.
The Count
9. The single count, Count 1, of this interference is as follows:
The sole claim of junior party Chaffee's application 29/155,070
or
The sole claim of senior party Skulnick's Patent No. D 452,466
The Disclosed Boat Fender Design
10. Figure 1 in each party's specification illustrates the boat fender design as seen from
a front view of the invention.
11. Figure 2 in each party's specification illustrates the boat fender design as seen from
a rear view of the invention.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007