Interference No. 105,125
Chaffee v. Skulnick
22. Figure 13 in each party's specification illustrates the boat fender design of Figure 9
but as seen from the left side.
23. Figure 14 in each party's specification illustrates the boat fender design of Figure 9
but as seen fi7om the right side.
24. Figure 15 in each party's specification illustrates the boat fender design of Figure 9
but as seen from the front, top, and right.
25. Figure 16 in each party's specification illustrates the boat fender design of figure
15 but with a dock and pilings shown in dotted lines.
26. When provoking an interference with senior party's involved patent, junior party
Thomas J. Chaffee filed a submission entitled "SHOWING UNDER 37 C.F.R. � 1.608(b)."
27. In his showing under 37 CFR � 1.608(b), junior party Thomas J. Chaffee alleges
that he actually reduced the boat fender design invention to practice prior to the effective filing
date of senior party's involved patent, February 27, 2001, and further had shipped the
constructed device to senior party Steve Skuhrick prior to February 27, 2001,
28. In his showing under 37 CFR � 1.608(b), junior party Thomas J. Chaffee submitted
paper copies of photographic images stored in a computer and stated in a declaration as follows:
"The attached photographs, which were all taken prior to February 27, 2001, show a prototype of
the boat fender that 1 constructed prior to February 27, 2001."
29. In his showing under 37 CFR � 1.608(b), junior party Thomas J. Chaffee submitted
paper copies of e-mail correspondences and stated in a declaration as follows: "The attached
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007