Ex Parte Lawlyes et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-0303                                                                                           
              Application No. 09/928,884                                                                                     

                      Representative independent claim 15 is reproduced as follows:                                          
                      15.    A partitioned circuit assembly for integration into an                                          
                      engine controller comprising:                                                                          
                             a partitioned circuit element;                                                                  
                             a partitioned circuit housing surrounding said partitioned circuit                              
                      element; and                                                                                           
                             a plurality of connectors.                                                                      
                      The examiner relies on the following references:                                                       
                      Natsume                             5,764,487                     Jun. 09, 1998                        
                      Denzene et al. (Denzene)            6,219,258                     Apr. 17, 2001                        
                                                                         (Filed Jan. 29, 1999)                               
                      Claims 8, and 13-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §102 (b) over Natsume.                              
                      Claims 9-12, 16, and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103 as unpatentable                            
              over Natsume in view of Denzene.                                                                               
                      Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of                             
              appellants and the examiner.                                                                                   
                                                          OPINION                                                            
                      Turning first to the rejection under 35 U.S.C. §102 (b), a claim is anticipated only                   
              when a single prior art reference expressly or inherently discloses each and every                             
              element or step thereof.  Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices Inc., 848 F.2d 1560,                              
              1570, 7 USPQ2d 1057, 1064 (Fed. Cir. 1988); RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data                                  



                                                             2                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007