Appeal No. 2005-0303 Application No. 09/928,884 disclosing the structure but not the intended use. In re Sinex, 309 F.2d 488, 492, 135 USPQ 302, 305 (CCPA 1962). Natsume, in our view, discloses the structure, even if, arguably, not appellants’ intended use. Second, even if the preamble recitation of an “engine controller” is considered to give life and meaning to the instant claims, and we do not view it as such, since the junction block of Natsume involves mating electrical components such as fuses, relays, and wiring harness connectors, it would not be unfair to say, in a broad sense, that the elements disclosed by Natsume constitute an “engine controller” in the sense that fuses, relays, and wiring harness connectors are responsible, in their small part, for keeping the automotive engine running. Note column 1, lines 15 et seq. of the reference, where it is stated that the electrical junction block is employed for the “distribution of electrical power from the battery and alternator to the various electrical systems of the vehicle.” If that electrical power is not properly distributed, the engine will not operate. Thus, the junction block may be said to be an “engine controller.” Accordingly, we will sustain the rejection of claims 8, and 13-15 under 35 U.S.C. §102 (b). Turning to the rejection of claims 9-12, 16, and 17 under 35 U.S.C. §103, the examiner turns to Denzene for a teaching of a heat sink, a passivation material, and a seal element employed in a pre-assembled circuit assembly, and concludes that it would have been obvious to adapt the pre-assembled circuit assembly of Natsume to 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007