Ex Parte Lawlyes et al - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2005-0303                                                                                           
              Application No. 09/928,884                                                                                     

              disclosing the structure but not the intended use.  In re Sinex, 309 F.2d 488, 492, 135                        
              USPQ 302, 305 (CCPA 1962).  Natsume, in our view, discloses the structure, even if,                            
              arguably, not appellants’ intended use.                                                                        
                      Second, even if the preamble recitation of an “engine controller” is considered to                     
              give life and meaning to the instant claims, and we do not view it as such, since the                          
              junction block of Natsume involves mating electrical components such as fuses, relays,                         
              and wiring harness connectors, it would not be unfair to say, in a broad sense, that the                       
              elements disclosed by Natsume constitute an “engine controller” in the sense that fuses,                       
              relays, and wiring harness connectors are responsible, in their small part, for keeping                        
              the automotive engine running.  Note column 1, lines 15 et seq. of the reference, where                        
              it is stated that the electrical junction block is employed for the “distribution of electrical                
              power from the battery and alternator to the various electrical systems of the vehicle.”  If                   
              that electrical power is not properly distributed, the engine will not operate.  Thus, the                     
              junction block may be said to be an “engine controller.”                                                       
                      Accordingly, we will sustain the rejection of claims 8, and 13-15 under 35 U.S.C.                      
              §102 (b).                                                                                                      
                      Turning to the rejection of claims 9-12, 16, and 17 under 35 U.S.C. §103, the                          
              examiner turns to Denzene for a teaching of a heat sink, a passivation material, and a                         


              seal element employed in a pre-assembled circuit assembly, and concludes that it                               
              would have been obvious to adapt the pre-assembled circuit assembly of Natsume to                              
                                                             7                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007