The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM Z. GOLDSTEIN
____________
Appeal No. 2005-0823
Application No. 10/300,895
____________
HEARD: June 7, 2005
____________
Before RUGGIERO, LEVY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1-3, 7-15, 19, 20, 37-39,
43-46, 48-51, 55, 56, 62-66, 70-74, 78-82, 86-90, 94-98, 102-106,
110-114 and 118-1221.
1
1 We observe that although page 2 of the final rejection (mailed July
13, 2004) lists claims 13 and 49 as being rejected, no rejection of these
claims appears in either the final rejection or the examiner's answer.
Accordingly, we consider these claims to not be before us for decision on
appeal. (see brief, pages 25, 26).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007