Appeal No. 2005-0823 Application No. 10/300,895 Page 9 to a customer, reporting the issuance of the ticket to an intermediate agent on Tuesday night, and imposing a fee for changes made after the issuance of the ticket has been reported. The examiner notes that IAH does not disclose that “the prescribed rate minimizes the amount of time between issuance and reporting." We consider the examiner’s statement to mean that IAH does not disclose reporting the issuance of the ticket by the following day. To make up for this deficiency of IAH, the examiner turns to Brice for a teaching of "the SABRE system which retrieves the reports from the intermediate agent as a batch process that can be scheduled to occur alternately on Monday at 1 am, or daily, monthly or periodically." The examiner notes that Brice also does not teach "the motivation more frequent reporting." The examiner's statement is not very clear. However, we consider the examiner to be attempting to say that Brice also does not disclose reporting the issuance of the travel ticket by the following day. To overcome the deficiencies of IAH and Brice, the examiner (answer, page 4) turns to IATA for a teaching of a "suggestion by Bruce Bishins, President of U.S. Travel Agency [sic] Registry" that “‘the airlines alleged that ARC would soon ‘enhance’ IAR to move the world to daily reportingPage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007