Appeal No. 2005-0823
Application No. 10/300,895 Page 12
reporting and does not disclose or suggest anything other than
weekly reporting. With respect to Brice, appellant asserts (id.)
that although Brice discloses an accounting system that can
generate reports, it does not suggest that the reports have
anything to do with CRS, and (brief, page 15) that nothing in
Brice suggests that the reports serve any function other than
internal management. Appellant adds that Brice does not teach
running daily reports because customized reports are not daily
reports. Turning to IATA, appellant asserts (brief, page 16)
that the IATA article expressly states that ARC had no plans to
move to daily reporting, and that daily reporting would only
occur if IATA consolidated its Billing and Settlement Plans
(BSPs) and chose ARC to run its operations.
It is further argued (brief, page 17) that not only is there
no motivation for combining IAH with Brice, but that IATA teaches
away from being combined with IAH and Brice because there is no
reason to combine a reference related to reporting ticket
instances with one for back-office internal reporting. Appellant
adds (brief, page 18) that there were no plans to move away from
weekly reporting. It is further asserted (id.) that the
statements in IATA are double and triple hearsay.
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007