Ex Parte Jakobsson et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0986                                                        
          Application No. 09/727,904                                                  

          given information item purchased by the user, resulting in                  
          complete privacy for the user.                                              

               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:           
               1. A method for controlling access to one or more                      
          information items purchasable from a merchant and accessible over           
          a network, wherein a user interested in a given information item            
          is permitted to access a corresponding signed ciphertext of the             
          given information item, the signed ciphertext having at least a             
          first ciphertext portion, the method comprising the steps of:               
               receiving from the user a blinded version of the first                 
          ciphertext portion of the signed ciphertext in conjunction with a           
          request from the user for purchase of the given information item            
          from the merchant; and                                                      
               decrypting the blinded version of the first ciphertext                 
          portion and returning to the user the resulting decrypted blinded           
          version of the first ciphertext portion, wherein the resulting              
          decrypted blinded version provides information that is utilized             
          by the user in conjunction with accessing the given information             
          item in a manner such that the merchant is unable to identify the           
          given information item purchased by the user.                               
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Nishioka et al. (Nishioka)     5,754,656        May 19, 1998                
          Kyojima et al. (Kyojima)       6,275,936     Aug. 14, 2001                  
                         (filed Oct. 15, 1998)                                        
          Zheng          6,396,928                        May 28, 2002                
                         (filed Oct. 24, 1997)                                        
               Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                  
          evidence of obviousness, the examiner offers Nishioka and Kyojima           

                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007