Appeal No. 2005-2530
Application No. 10/612,129
Turning now to the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 5 and
6, we note Appellants’ reliance on the same arguments made above
with respect to claim 1. Based on our discussion above, we also
find the combination of Hiroshi with Lee and Lupinski to be
reasonable to support a prima facie case of obviousness.
Therefore, we also sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of
claims 5 and 6 over Lee, Lupinski and Hiroshi.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007