The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte ANDREW ROSENBERG and RICHARD PEPE _______________ Appeal 2005-0642 Application 09/568,2781 Technology Center 3600 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before: GARRIS, JERRY SMITH, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge. AFFIRMED 1 Application filed May 9, 2000, as a continuation of application 09/120,560, filed July 22, 1998, now abandoned, seeking to reissue U.S. Patent 5,628,531, issued May 13, 1997, based on application 08/429,317, filed April 26, 1995. The real party in interest is TI Group Automotive Systems, LLC. (United States Patent and Trademark Office assignment abstracts, Reel 012407, Frame 0436). The Appeal Brief erroneously states that the real party is named in the caption of the Brief, i.e., the real party is the inventors (Brief at page 2).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007