Ex Parte Chamberlin et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2005-1816                                                                Παγε 2                                       
             Application No. 09/727,622                                                                                                       


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                                                 
                    The appellants' invention relates to a method of operating a camless internal                                             
             combustion engine that includes lubricating the engine using a low-phosphorus or                                                 
             phosphorus-free lubricating oil composition in order to "provide an engine and a                                                 
             lubricant system for that engine that adequately addresses the antiwear protection                                               
             needs of the engine and yet reduces or avoids damage to the exhaust gas                                                          
             aftertreatment device" (specification, page 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set                                        
             forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                             
                                               The Applied Prior Art                                                                          
                    The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                                           
             appealed claims are:                                                                                                             
             Schechter     5,456,222   Oct. 10, 1995                                                                                          
             Manka et al. (Manka)   5,834,407   Nov. 10, 1998                                                                                 


                                                   The Rejection                                                                              
                    Claims 1, 3-9 and 13-41 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                     
             unpatentable over Schechter in view of Manka.                                                                                    
                    Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                                             
             the appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the final                                              
             rejection (mailed January 7, 2004) and answer (mailed August 6, 2004) for the                                                    
















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007