Ex Parte Chamberlin et al - Page 7




             Appeal No. 2005-1816                                                                Παγε 7                                       
             Application No. 09/727,622                                                                                                       


             (CCPA 1978)).  It thus follows that the like rejection of claims 3-9 and 13-41 is also                                           
             sustained.                                                                                                                       


                                                   CONCLUSION                                                                                 
                    To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 3-9 and 13-                                                
             41 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is AFFIRMED.                                                                                            


                    No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal                                            
             may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).                                                                                         
                                                     AFFIRMED                                                                                 





                                  CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )                                                                                      
                                  Administrative Patent Judge )                                                                               
                                                                            )                                                                 
                                                                            )                                                                 
                                                                            )                                                                 
                                                                            ) BOARD OF PATENT                                                 
                                  JEFFREY V. NASE )         APPEALS                                                                           
                                  Administrative Patent Judge )              AND                                                              
                                                                            )   INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                                            )                                                                 
                                                                            )                                                                 
                                                                            )                                                                 
                                  JENNIFER D. BAHR )                                                                                          
                                  Administrative Patent Judge )                                                                               
















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007