Ex Parte 5832461 et al - Page 4



              Appeal No. 2005-2642                                                                                            
              Reexamination Control No. 90/005,841                                                                            

                      the manner in which each respective component is accrued or retired, the                                
                      cash flow characteristics of the account can be significantly altered to fit                            
                      the requisites of the individual or institution.                                                        
              Id. at col. 3, ll. 13-23.                                                                                       
                      None of the patent claims have been amended during this reexamination                                   
              proceeding.  There are three independent claims (1, 24, and 36), of which claim 24                              
              reads:                                                                                                          
                      24.  In combination, in an investment system for managing inflation risk:                               
                             means for establishing data representative of a deposit account                                  
                                     with an institution, the deposit account having a principal                              
                                     component representing the cash investment of a depositor                                
                                     for an account term, and an accrual component comprising a                               
                                     fixed interest component which is enhanced at a fixed                                    
                                     interest rate times the principal component and a variable                               
                                     interest component which is enhanced at an index                                         
                                     responsive to the rate of inflation times the principal                                  
                                     component; and                                                                           
                             an account management dataprocessor [sic] including means for                                    
                                     paying the deposit account over the term.                                                
              D.  The grouping of the claims                                                                                  
                      At page 5 of the brief, appellant states that “[f]or purposes of this Appeal, all of                    
              the claims shall be considered separately and do not stand or fall together.”  Under 37                         
              CFR               § 1.192(c)(7) (2001), which was in effect when the brief was filed, a group                   
              of claims rejected on the same ground can be treated as standing or falling together                            
              unless the brief states that the claims of the group do not stand or fall together and                          
              explains why the claims are believed to be separately patentable.  As noted below,                              
              some of the rejected claims have not been separately argued and thus will be treated as                         
              standing or falling with their parent claims.                                                                   
              E.  The scope and meaning of the claims5                                                                        
                                                                                                                             
                      5  The copy of the claims provided in Appendix I to the brief is inaccurate in that it                  
              fails to accurately reproduce the formulas recited in claims 12 and 21.                                         

                                                              4                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007