Appeal No. 2005-2642
Reexamination Control No. 90/005,841
Claims 24-26, 28-32, 34-37, and 38-448 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as unpatentable over Mukherjee in view of Musmanno.
Claims 1-23, 31, 33, and 44 stand rejected under § 103(a) as unpatentable over
Mukherjee in view of Bodie and further in view of Musmanno.
Claims 27 and 38 stand rejected under § 103(a) as unpatentable over Mukherjee
in view Musmanno and Williamson.
8 The inclusion of claim 38 in the statement of this ground of rejection is
obviously a typographical error, because that claim is not mentioned in the discussion of
this ground of rejection in the Final Action (at 3-14, ¶¶ 7-23) or in the Answer (at 3-12,
¶¶ 2-18). Instead, it is addressed only in the discussion of the rejection based on
Mukherjee, Musmanno, and Williamson. Final Action at 28, ¶ 52; Answer at 23-24, ¶
46.
13
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007