Appeal No. 2005-2642 Reexamination Control No. 90/005,841 evidences an intent to have the phrase “directly responsive to” construed as requiring a continuous relationship. Appellant’s argument that the foregoing definition from the ‘461 patent requires us to construe the claims as requiring that the inflation adjustments be a continuous function of the rate of prior actual inflation is wrong on two counts. First, as explained above, the phrase “directly responsive to” in the definition does not imply a continuous relationship. Second, even assuming it does, the definition does not address the relationship between the inflation adjustments and the rate of inflation. Instead, it addresses the relationship between the inflation adjustments and “a market indicator of prior actual inflation,” which need not represent the rate of prior actual inflation. In fact, appellant’s disclosed market indicators of prior actual inflation represent inflated price levels, from which the inflation rates and the resulting inflation adjustments are calculated: Once the current inflation index (CPIc) is determined, the level of inflation since the last reporting period is estimated by consideration of a preselected inflation index which reflects prior actual inflation. A preferred embodiment of the present invention utilizes the consumer price index CPI-U, for all items. However, any number of indexes may be successfully utilized including, but not limited to CPI-W, Producer Price Index, the Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross National Product, or any component of these price level measures so long as the index reflects some measure of past inflation. The level [of] inflation which has occurred since the previous iteration period can be determined by the formula: CPIc - CPIo —————– CPIo Where CPIo i[s] the inflation index at the time of the last iteration, or the initial index if the present iteration is the first. ‘673 Patent at col. 6, ll. 27-46 (emphasis added). “If . . . inflation has occurred during the prior iteration period, the cash outflow or disbursement attributable to the effects of inflation on the account balance is determined by applying the inflation rate to the deposit balance.” Id. at col. 6, ll. 58-62. Because the “market indicator of prior actual inflation” need not represent the rate of prior actual inflation, a claim recitation that an 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007