Ex Parte MIYAGAWA et al - Page 1





                               THIS DOCUMENT WAS NOT WRITTEN WITH PUBLICATION IN MIND                                            
                                       AND IS NOT BINDING PRECEDENT OF THE BOARD                                                 
                                                                                           Paper No. ___                         

                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                       _____________                                                             
                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                       _____________                                                             
                               Ex parte NAOYASU MIYAGAWA and YASUHIRO GOTOH                                                      
               _____________                                                                                                     
                                                   Appeal No. 2006-0386                                                          
                                 Application 09/460,222 for reissue of Patent 5,235,581                                          
                                                      ______________                                                             
                                                 HEARD: February 21, 2006                                                        
                                                     _______________                                                             

               Before CAROFF, PATE, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
               MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                              

                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's rejection of claims                            
               26, 28-32, and 34-38, which are all of the pending claims, under 35 U.S.C. § 251 on the                           
               ground of reissue recapture.  We reverse.                                                                         
               A.  Background                                                                                                    
                      The application on appeal identifies itself as a continuation of Application                               
               08/396,981 (“the 981 application”), which was filed on March 1, 1995, for reissuance of                           
               Patent 5,235,581 (“the original patent”), issued August 10, 1993.  The ‘981 application,                          

                                                               1                                                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007