The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
12written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5
6
7 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
8 __________
9
10 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
11 AND INTERFERENCES
12 __________
13
14 Ex parte BALASUBRAMANIAM RAMALINGAM
15 __________
16
17 Appeal No. 2006-0415
18 Application No. 10/267,200
19 ___________
20
21 ON BRIEF
22 ___________
23
24
25 Before SCHAFER, TIERNEY, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
26
27 MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
28
29
30
31 DECISION ON APPEAL
32 This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
33 rejection of claims 27-54. Claims 1-26 have been canceled.
34 (Appeal Brief, Nov. 22, 2005, pages 1-2). Consequently, only
35 claims 27-54 are before us on this appeal.
36 We affirm the rejections of record, and make several
37 additional references of record.
38
39
40
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007