Appeal No. 2006-0415
Application No. 10/267,200
1 The References
2 In rejecting the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), the
3 examiner relies upon the following references:
4 De Keyser et al (De Keyser) 3,840,419 Oct. 08, 1974
5 Waddill (Waddill) 4,420,606 Dec. 13, 1983
6 Tesch et al. (Tesch) 4,607,069 Aug. 19, 1986
7 Marten et. al (Marten) 5,017,675 May 21, 1991
8 Davis (Davis) 5,037,700 Aug. 06, 1991
9 Dubois et al. (Dubois) 5,244,998 Sep. 14, 1993
10 The following new references are discussed in this decision.
11 Kigawa et al. (Kigawa) 5,319,062 Jun. 07, 1994
12
13 Epoxy Resins, Their Applications and Technology, “Adhesives,” pp.
14 222-225, Lee & Neville, McGraw Hill, 1957.
15
16 Resin/Hardener Combinations, Pro-Set Laminating Epoxy
17 Resin/Hardener Combinations, February 23, 2000.
18
19 “Preventing Asthma and Death from Diisocyanate Exposure,” National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Publication 96-111
2021 (1996).
22
23 Mark’s Standard handbook for Mechanical Engineers, Tenth Edition,
24 page 1-22
25
26 The Rejections
27 A) Claims 27-33, 35-41, 43, 45-46, and 48-54 stand rejected
28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over De Keyser in
29 view of at least one of Marten, Tesch, and Waddill.
30 B) Claim 34 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
31 unpatentable over De Keyser in view of at least one of Marten,
32 Tesch, and Waddill, further in view of Dubois.
33
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007