Ex Parte Paul et al - Page 1



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                      Ex parte CHARLES W. PAUL, PETER A. WALTER                       
                                and CYNTHIA L. MEISNER                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2006-0894                                 
                              Application No. 10/412,840                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before PAK, KRATZ and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1-6, 13-18 and 21-24.                                   
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants’ invention relates to a process of preparing a              
          cured product by employing a coating and a curing step, wherein a           
          low moisture content substrate or liner is employed as a coating            
          base.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a              
          reading of exemplary claims 1 and 13, which are reproduced below.           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007