Ex Parte Paul et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-0894                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 10/412,840                                                  

                    1. A Process for coating and curing a cationic                    
               curable pressure sensitive adhesive on a release liner                 
               and/or backing substrate whereby a cationic curable                    
               adhesive is coated on a release liner and/or backing                   
               substrate having a low moisture content and then                       
               allowed to cure under low moisture conditions.                         
                    13. A process of preparing a cured adhesive                       
               article comprising coating a cationic curable adhesive                 
               onto a film substrate having a moisture content of less                
               than about 5% and initiating cure, wherein the moisture                
               content of the coated substrate is maintained at a                     
               level of less than about 5% until the adhesive is                      
               substantially fully cured.                                             
               The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the              
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Erickson                 5,382,604                Jan. 17, 1995             
               Appellants cite to the following reference of record in                
          support of arguments presented in the brief.                                
          Erickson et al., “Liquid Reactive Polymers For Radiation Curable            
          High Performance PSAs” Pressure Sensitives, pages 18-24, June               
          18-21, 1995.                                                                
               Claims 1-6, 13-18 and 21-24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 102(b) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Erickson.                     
               We refer to the brief and to the answer for a complete                 
          exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed by appellants and           
          the examiner concerning the issues before us on this appeal.                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007