The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CHRISTOPHE F. L. POMAREDE, CORNELIUS A. VAN DER JEUGD, ALEXANDER GSCHWANDTNER and ANDRES GRASSI ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1333 Application No. 10/347,849 ____________ HEARD ____________ Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 24-32. Claims 1- 23 and 33-40 have been canceled. An amendment filed May 19, 2004 after final rejection has been approved for entry by the Examiner. The disclosed invention relates to a method of forming an integrated circuit thatPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007