Ex Parte Levine - Page 9


                   Appeal No. 2006-1373                                                                                           
                   Application No. 09/814,054                                                                                     
                   was not remedied by the Ohmura3 reference despite its teaching of providing to the driver                      
                   only the necessary information without offering any excessive amount of information.  We                       
                   agree with Appellant that the combination of Asano and Ohmura does not satisfy the                             
                   claimed limitation of displaying only the present position of the vehicle and the selected                     
                   destination without showing any routing path interconnecting them.                                             
                          It is our view, after consideration of the record before us, that the evidence relied                   
                   upon and the level of skill in the particular art would have not suggested to one of ordinary                  
                   skill in the art the invention as set forth in claims 51, 52, 55-65, 67 and 68.  Accordingly,                  
                   we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims 51, 52, 55-65, 67 and 68.                               


                          II.  Under 35 USC 103, is the Rejection of Claims 53, 54 and 66 as Being                                
                   Unpatentable over the combination of Asano, Ohmura and Kubon Proper?                                           
                          With respect to dependent claims 53, 54 and 66, Appellant argues at page 10 of the                      
                   Appeal Brief that the Asano-Ohmura-Kubon combination does not teach the claimed two-                           
                   phase system, wherein the first phase entails displaying only two markings indicative of the                   
                   present location of the vehicle and the selected destination while the second phase entails                    
                   identifying individual buildings and landmarks at the destination.                                             
                          We find that Kubon is concerned with converting a composite video signal into a                         
                   form suitable for a bar code decoder to detect the companion bar code within a composite                       
                   video signal.  The Kubon reference is particularly relied upon for its teaching of a bar code                  
                   detector to identify road signs on the vehicle’s path.  See figure 16.  The Kubon reference,                   
                   however, fails to cure the deficiencies of the Asano-Ohmura combination, as noted above                        
                                                                                                                                 
                   3 This reference is relied upon for its teaching of Heads-up Display, whereby route information is displayed   
                   on the windshield of the vehicle, as depicted in figure 1.                                                     

                                                                 9                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007