Appeal No. 2006-1467 Page 12
Application No. 10/302,271
sustain the examiner’s obviousness rejection of claims 4 and 5,
on this record.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-3 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sluzewski in view
of Kirkland and Kolesar and to reject claims 4 and 5 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sluzewski in view
of Kirkland is affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007