Ex Parte Morita - Page 4


            Appeal No. 2006-1622                                                                            
            Application No. 10/020,956                                                                      

                   hub (11) and the inner rib (12) are deformed which would inherently                      
                   deflect both flanges), by deflecting said upper and Iower flanges toward                 
                   each other over an entire circumference thereof  [See Final Rej. at p. 2]                
                The appellant responded                                                                     

                      In the present case, the Examiner appears to set forth a hypothetical                 
                   situation where the magnetic tape wrapping force in a radial direction is                
                   “greater than the hub and the inner rib structures” so that the magnetic                 
                   tape wrapping force would inherently deform both the hub and the inner                   
                   hub. However, as noted above, Iwahashi expressly discloses that the ribs                 
                   21 prevent the outer cylindrical section from radially and inwardly bending              
                   by the pressure exerted from the tape wound therearound, so that this                    
                   hypothetical situation described by the Examiner would never happen in                   
                   Iwahashi.  [See Brief at p. 13]                                                          
                The examiner then responded                                                                 

                      The invention of Iwahashi ‘826 is designed to prevent the inward radial               
                   deformation, but the prior art teaches Appellant's claimed invention by its              
                   recognition of the  deformation and an attempt to prevent it. The reference              
                   as a whole teaches the concept of means for gradually decreasing a                       
                   distance between the flanges and the hub as the magnetic tape is                         
                   wrapped around the hub. Iwahashi '826 recognizes the problem with an                     
                   inward radial bending to the hub caused by the tape tightly wrapped                      
                   around the hub. As the hub deforms radially, both of the flanges deflect                 
                   inwardly to the hub. Iwahashi '826 attempts to solve the problem by                      
                   shortening the length of the rib which prevents the outer cylindrical section            
                   from an inward radial deformation when the tape is tightly wound around                  
                   the outer cylindrical section, see column 2, lines 1-17. [See Answer at p.               
                   5]                                                                                       
                The appellant finally responded regarding this bending in the prior art                     

                      Thus, the radially inward bending or deformation is at an upper portion               
                   of the outer cylindrical section of the tape reel. Quite clearly, nothing is             
                   ever mentioned about the upper and lower flanges of the tape reel                        
                   deflecting towards each other over an entire circumference thereof let                   
                   alone “means for gradually decreasing a distance between said upper                      
                   flange and said lower flange outside the outer peripheral surface of the                 
                   hub, as said magnetic tape is being wrapped around said hub, by                          
                   deflecting said upper and lower flanges towards each other over an entire                
                   circumference thereof” as recited in Appellant's independent claim 1.                    


                                                     4                                                      


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007