Ex Parte Mitra et al - Page 1



         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was             
         not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the            
         Board.                                                                     
                                                                                   
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                     
                                    __________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    __________                                      
                      Ex parte SUBHASISH MITRA and KEE SUP KIM                      
                                    __________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2006-1729                                
                             Application No. 10/107,628                             
                                    ___________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                      
                                    ___________                                     
         Before HAIRSTON, SAADAT, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent                 
         Judges.                                                                    
         HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
              This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the           
         final rejection of claims 1 through 22, 24 through 26 and 28               
         through 34, all of which are pending in this application.  Claim           
         35 has been objected to by the Examiner.  Claims 23 and 27 have            
         been cancelled by Appellants.                                              

         We affirm in part.                                                         






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007