The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JACKSON L. ELLIS, DAVID R. NOELDNER, DAVID M. SPRINGBERG and GRAEME M. WESTON-LEWIS ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1783 Application No. 09/183,6941 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before BARRY, BLANKENSHIP, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-17, which constitute all of the claims pending in this application. We affirm-in-part. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention is directed to a data controller which includes a command queuing engine for creating a plurality of Application for patent filed October 30, 1998.1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007