The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and isnot binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SINNOSUKE SEKIYA, SETSUO YAMAMOTO, YUTAKA KOMA, MASASHI
AOKI and NAOHIRO MATSUYA
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1870
Application No. 10/100,901
Technology Center 3700
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before OWENS, LEVY, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-6 and 8-10. Claims 7 and 11-59 have been
withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to non-elected
species (brief, page 1).
We REVERSE; and enter a New Ground of Rejection under
the provisions of 37 CFR § 41.50(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007