The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte PETER HAZUCHA
and KRISHNAMURTHY SOUMYANATH
_______________
Appeal No. 2006-1901
Application No. 10/742,436
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, SAADAT, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from
the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3, 5-9 and 11. Claims
12-19 have been indicated as allowable while claims 4 and 10 have
been objected to as being dependent upon a rejected claim, but
otherwise allowable if rewritten to include all the limitations
of their base claim and any intervening claims.
We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007