Ex Parte Hazucha et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-1901                                                        
          Application No. 10/742,436                                                  

          BACKGROUND                                                                  
               Appellants’ invention is directed to a method of protection            
          against single event upsets (SEUs) in a latch circuit which may             
          be caused by ionizing radiation.  According to Appellants,                  
          protecting against SEUs restores a latch output to its original             
          value or suppresses such transient signals (specification, page             
          4).  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a                
          reading of exemplary independent claim 1, which is reproduced               
          bellow:                                                                     
               1.   A latch circuit, comprising:                                      
               a first latch; and                                                     
               a second latch to harden the latch circuit to a single event           
          upset, the second latch including a transmission gate including             
          two transistors, the transmission gate having an output port to             
          couple to only one transistor of the first latch.                           
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art references:             
          Jamshidi et al. (Jamshidi)    5,646,558           Jul. 8, 1997              
          Zhang                         6,026,011           Feb. 15, 2000             
          T. Calin et al. (Calin), “Upset Hardened Memory Design for                  
          Submicron CMOS Technology,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science,           
          Vol. 43, No. 6, December 1996, pp. 2874-2878.                               
               Claims 1-3, 7-9 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Calin and Jamshidi.                     


                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007