Appeal No. 2006-1901
Application No. 10/742,436
claims include assertions similar to those addressed above with
respect to claim 1 (brief, pages 10-12). We are unpersuaded that
the combination of Jamshidi with Zhang, as set forth by the
Examiner (answer, page 4-6 & 8). As such, and for the reasons
similar to those underlying our conclusion with respect to claim
1, we find that the Examiner has set forth a reasonable case of
prima facie obviousness and the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of
claims 1-3, 5 and 6 over Zhang and Jamshidi should be sustained.
CONCLUSION
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner
rejecting claims 1-3, 5-9 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
affirmed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007