Appeal No. 2006-2441
Application No. 10/056,224
associated with the probe signals; and
(5) storing the temporal identifier signal and the
probe signals in memory.
References
The Examiner relies on the following references:
Razban 5,289,587 Feb. 22, 1994
Bunnell 5,564,015 Oct. 8, 1996
Roeber et al. (Roeber) 5,682,328 Oct. 28, 1997
(filed on Sep. 11, 1996)
Mahalingaiah et al. (Mahalingaiah) 5,933,626 Aug. 3, 1999
(filed on June 12, 1997)
Levine et al. (Levine) 6,067,644 May 23, 2000
(filed on Apr. 15, 1998)
Rejections At Issue
A. Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over the combination of Bunnell and Roeber.
B. Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over the combination of Bunnell, Roeber and Razban.
C. Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over the combination of Bunnell, Roeber and Levine.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007