Appeal No. 2006-3284
Application No. 10/061,871
contain the necessary profiles for configuring the server. It is
our view that that one of ordinary skill in the art at the time
of the present invention would have readily recognized that
Kamper’s teaching of determining which of the files stored on the
removable media is more suitable for configuring a particular
server amounts to selecting a current file for configuring said
server. The ordinarily skilled artisan would have duly
recognized that since the server polls the devices attached
thereto each time it needs to locate configuration files, such
acquired files are, from the standpoint point of the selecting
server, necessarily the most currently and pertinently available
configuration files on the storage device at the time of
selection. We further find that Sun’s teachings are cumulative
to Kamper’s. Consequently, we do not find error in the
Examiner’s stated position, which concludes that the combination
of Kamper and Sun teaches the limitation of generating a server
configuration profile image based on a current configuration
server.
It is therefore our view, after consideration of the record
before us, that the evidence relied upon and the level of skill in
the particular art would have suggested to the ordinarily skilled
artisan the invention as set forth in claim 18. Accordingly, we
will sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims 18, 20 through 30.
14
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007