The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ERIC M. LEPROUST and ROBERT E. WOODWORTH __________ Appeal 2006-0592 Application 10/278,274 Technology Center 1600 __________ DECIDED: April 30, 2007 __________ Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and LORA M. GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1-12, 14-18, and 20, all the claims remaining in the application. The Examiner has rejected the claims as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013