Appeal 2006-1914
Application 09/764,609
1 CONCLUSION OF LAW
2 On the record before us, we hold that the teachings and suggestions of
3 Chader would not have suggested the claimed subject matter, but that the
4 teachings and suggestions of Chader in view of Acker would have suggested
5 the language of claims 1, 3-23, 25-29, 31-34, 80-100, 102, 105, and 106.
6
7 DECISION AND ORDER
8 The Examiner's rejection of claims 1, 3-23, 25-29, 31-34, 80-100, 102,
9 105, and 106 is affirmed.
10 No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
11 this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a) (1)(iv).
12
13 AFFIRMED
14
15
16
17
18 vsh
19
20
21 J. WILLIAM FRANK, III
22 MCCRACKEN & FRANK
23 200 W. ADAMS
24 SUITE 2150
25 CHICAGO IL 60606
26
26
Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Last modified: September 9, 2013