The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN FREDERICK ACKERMAN,
VENKAT SUBRAMANIAN VENKATARAMANI,
IRENE T. SPITSBERG,
BRETT ALLEN ROHRER BOUTWELL and
RAMGOPAL DAROLIA
____________
Appeal 2006-2179
Application 10/735,369
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: January 11, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of
claims 1 through 20 which are all of the claims pending in the above-
identified application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013