Ex Parte Zehler - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                        Ex parte EUGENE R. ZEHLER                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                               Appeal 2006-2269                                                   
                                            Application 10/051,938                                                
                                            Technology Center 3600                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                          Decided:  January 19, 2007                                              
                                                 ____________                                                     

                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                                  
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
                GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                       This appeal involves claims 38-40, 43, 46-48, 52, 54-56, 59, 62-64,                        
                67-70, 73, 76-78 and 81-84.  We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant                        
                to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                                               
                       We AFFIRM and REMAND.                                                                      







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013