Appeal 2006-2269
Application 10/051,938
This remand to the Examiner pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(1)
(2006) is not made for further consideration of a rejection. Accordingly,
37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(2) (2006) does not apply.
CONCLUSION
We have affirmed the § 103(a) rejection of claims 38-40, 43, 52,
54-56, 59, 67-70, 73, 77-78 and 81-84 over Duncan in view of Funkhouser.
We have affirmed the § 112, 1st paragraph rejection of claims 46-48,
62-64 and 76 as lacking written description.
The Examiner’s decision is affirmed and the application is remanded
to the Examiner.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(2006).
AFFIRMED & REMANDED
tf/clj
Cognis Corporation
Patent Department
300 Brookside Avenue
Ambler, PA 19002
14
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Last modified: September 9, 2013