Appeal 2006-2351
Application 10/645,493
Murata, (3) the § 103(a) rejection of claim 29 over Molnar I in view of
Bajaj, and (4) the § 103(a) rejection of claims 30 and 31 over Molnar I in
view of Cook.
DECISION
The Examiner’s rejection of claims 17-19, 21-23, 28, 33, and 36 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being unpatentable over Molnar I is AFFIRMED.
The Examiner’s rejection of claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Nishida is AFFIRMED.
The Examiner’s rejection of claims 24-26 are rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Horie is
AFFIRMED.
The Examiner’s rejection of claim 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Murata is AFFIRMED.
The Examiner’s rejection of claim 29 is rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Bajaj is
AFFIRMED.
The Examiner’s rejection of claims 30 and 31 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Cook is
AFFIRMED.
The Examiner’s rejection of claim 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Chiddick is AFFIRMED.
The Examiner’s rejection of claims 34 and 35 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Molnar II is
AFFIRMED.
14
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013