Appeal No. 2006-2850 Application No. 10/812,027 Conclusion In summary, we have sustained the Examiner’s rejections of claims 1, 3, 5 through 17, 23, 24, 25, 28, 30, 31, 33 through 38 and 40 through 44 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). However, we have not sustained the Examiner’s rejections of claims 18 through 22, 26, 27, 29 and 39 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). The decision of the Examiner is affirmed-in-part. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED-IN-PART MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ROBERT E. NAPPI ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ANTON W. FETTING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) REN vsh 14Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013