The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte THOMAS P. ORSINI and RUSSELL T. CHRISTMAN ________________ Appeal 2006-3022 Application 10/286,434 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: March 30, 2007 ________________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Statement of the Case This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1-11 and 16. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6. Appellants invented an apparatus for controlling the temperature of a sealing element in a film sealing machine. The invention involves thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013