Ex Parte Orsini et al - Page 6



                Appeal 2006-3022                                                                               
                Application 10/286,434                                                                         
                     desired temperature range. . . . Similarly, if the temperature is                         
                     below the desired value or range of values (i.e., below                                   
                     “AdjustStop”), the impulse duration can be increased, such as by                          
                     increments of 0.2 seconds, until the desired value or range of                            
                     values is achieved.” (Specification 9-11).                                                
                      Jurrius describes a sealing apparatus that fuses polymeric materials                     
                together (col. 1:14-20).  The apparatus includes a variable temperature by                     
                the heating elements.  If the desired heating temperature has not been                         
                reached, the controller (48) engages a solid state relay which engages a                       
                variable power controller that supplies power to the heating for adjusting the                 
                temperature (col. 9:12-33).                                                                    
                                              Principles of Law                                                
                      A claimed invention is anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102 when all of                     
                the elements of the claimed invention are found in one reference.  See                         
                Scripps Clinic & Research Found. V. Genentech Inc., 927 F.2d 1565, 1576,                       
                18 USPQ2d 1001, 1010 (Fed. Cir. 1991).  The prior art reference must                           
                disclose every limitation of the claimed invention, either explicitly or                       
                inherently.  In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44 USPQ2d 1429, 1433                        
                (Fed. Cir. 1997).                                                                              
                      An “apparatus claims cover what a device is, not what a device does.”                    
                Hewlett -Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 909 F.2d 1464, 1468, 15                           
                USPQ2d 1525, 1528 (Fed. Cir. 1990).  Therefore, the patentability of an                        
                apparatus claim depends on the claimed structure, not on the use or purpose                    
                of that structure, or the function or result of that structure.  In re Schreiber,              
                128 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44 USPQ2d 1429, 1431 (Fed. Cir. 1997); In re                              
                                                      6                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013