Appeal 2006-3022
Application 10/286,434
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 3 and 4 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 (a) over either Jurrius or Jurrius in view of Lunden, and further
in view of the admitted prior art at pages 1-3 of the Specification is affirmed.
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 7 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) over either Jurrius or Jurrius and Lunden is affirmed.
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-8, 10, 11 and 16
under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) over the admitted prior art and Jurrius and
optionally Lunden is affirmed.
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 9 under 35 U.S.C.
§103(a) over either Jurrius or the admitted prior art, and further in view of
Perret is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. §1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
ls
Nields & Lemack
176 East Main Street, Suite 7
Westboro, MA 01581
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: September 9, 2013