Ex Parte Orsini et al - Page 3



                Appeal 2006-3022                                                                               
                Application 10/286,434                                                                         
                      a controller responsive to said sensed temperature and adapted                           
                to modify the duration of said impulse power applied to said sealing                           
                element when said sensed temperature falls outside said temperature                            
                range and to continuously maintain said temperature within said range                          
                over a plurality of sealing cycles.                                                            

                      The prior art set forth below is relied upon by the Examiner as                          
                evidence of obviousness:                                                                       
                Perrett 5,326,416 Jul. 5, 1994                                                                 
                Linden 5,573,613 Nov. 12, 1996                                                                 
                Jurrius  5,616,199 Apr. 1, 1997                                                                

                Admitted Prior Art, see Background of Invention section, pages 1-3 of the                      
                Specification.                                                                                 
                      The Examiner entered the following rejections.                                           
                I.  Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 11, and 16 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §102(b)                 
                as anticipated by Jurrius.                                                                     
                II.  Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 11, and 16 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.                        
                §103(a) over Jurrius in view of Lunden.                                                        
                III.  Claims 3 and 4 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) over either                    
                Jurrius or Jurrius in view of Lunden, and further in view of the admitted                      
                prior art at pages 1-3 of the Specification.                                                   
                IV.  Claim 7 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over either Jurrius or                   
                Jurrius and Lunden.                                                                            


                                                      3                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013