The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte THIERRY RENAULT ______________ Appeal 2006-3219 Application 10/122,270 Technology Center 1700 _______________ Decided: May 30, 2007 _______________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicant appeals to the Board from the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 14, 15, 17 through 26, and 29 in the Final Action mailed September 2, 2005. Appellant canceled claim 21 subsequent to the Final Action leaving claims 14, 15, 17 through 20, 22 through 26, and 29 for our consideration. 5 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2005). We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013