Ex Parte Renault - Page 7

                  Appeal 2006-3219                                                                                              
                  Application 10/122,270                                                                                        

                  required two layers of blanks which can be of any length, width and depth.                                    
                  Thus, the “woven mats” or “structures” can range from extending between                                       
                  the inner margins of the two attachment portions and thus, across at least                                    
                  some portion of the central shock absorbing portion, to extending from one                                    
                  end of the part to the other.  Indeed, claim 14 encompasses any automotive                                    
                  part that can be obtained by molding at least the two specified layers of                                     
                  woven mat having thermoplastic resin materials therein.                                                       
                          The open-ended terms “comprising,” “including,” and, in this                                          
                  instance, “having,” open claim 14 to include a part molded from any manner                                    
                  of other material in the two required blanks; additional blanks containing                                    
                  any manner of materials and of any length, width, and depth; and any other                                    
                  material (see Specification, e.g., 4-10).  See, e.g., In re Baxter, 656 F.2d 679,                             
                  686-87, 210 USPQ 795, 802-03 (CCPA 1981) (“As long as one of the                                              
                  monomers in the reaction is propylene, any other monomer may be present,                                      
                  because the term ‘comprises’ permits the inclusion of other steps, elements,                                  
                  or materials.”); In re Bertsch, 132 F.2d 1014, 1019, 56 USPQ 379, 384                                         
                  (CCPA 1942) (“it is true that the word ‘comprising’ is usually in patent law                                  
                  held to be synonymous with the word ‘including’”); cf., Ex parte Davis,                                       
                  80 USPQ 448, 449 (Bd. App. 1948) (“the word ‘comprising’ alone being                                          
                  synonymous with ‘including’”).  On this record, we interpret the term                                         
                  “having” as used in the claim language to have its ordinary meaning of                                        
                  opening the claim to include additional materials because we find no basis in                                 
                  the claim language or in the written description in the Specification to                                      
                  interpret the term “having” in a limiting manner.  See In re Morris, 127 F.3d                                 
                  1048, 1054-55, 44 USPQ2d 1023, 1027 (Fed. Cir. 1997); In re Zletz,       893                                  


                                                               7                                                                

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013