The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte ANDREW D. HIRZEL
___________
Appeal 2006-3366
Application 10/864,041
Technology Center 2800
___________
Decided: July 31, 2007
___________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and
ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's
final rejection of claims 1-6, 8-10, and 12-20 . Claims 7 and 11 have been
canceled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). An Oral Hearing
was held on July 10, 2007.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013