Appeal 2007-0002 Application 10/188,485 surface of each layer evenly draws much of the moisture outwardly from the bread underneath the surface. As a result, the toasted crust is formed extending from the surface to a substantially uniform depth beneath the surface. Moisture retained by the bread underneath the surface is drawn outwardly toward the surface and buffers the heat, thereby enabling the surface to withstand the heated air currents without becoming burnt or brittle. Initially, the bread underneath the surface softens, as it gets warmer. (Specification 8:[0020] – 10:[0021].) 3. The Recipe discloses cooking the vegetables and beef and keeping these sandwich contents warm while toasting the bread on the griddle. 4. The Recipe does not disclose toasting the bread by impinging heated air surroundingly against the bread. 5. Russell teaches using radiant heat both to heat food in food heating chamber 30 and to heat bread in bread heating chambers 32 and 34 (Russell, col. 4, ll. 41-43 and 51-52). 6. Russell does not disclose toasting the bread by impinging heated air surroundingly against the bread. PRINCIPLES OF LAW In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), the examiner bears the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness. In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992). See also In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1472, 223 USPQ 785, 788 (Fed. Cir. 1984). It is incumbent upon the examiner to establish a factual basis to support the legal conclusion of obviousness. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013