Appeal 2007-0025 Page 32
Application 09/792,151
All of Appellants’ arguments having been addressed and found unpersuasive
as to error in the rejection, we affirm the rejection.
E. Conclusion of Law
On the record before us, Appellants have failed to show that the Examiner
erred in rejecting claims 6 and 14 over the prior art.
DECISION
The Examiner’s rejection of claims 2-9, 11-16 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
hh
SCULLY SCOTT MURPHY & PRESSER, PC
400 GARDEN CITY PLAZA
SUITE 300
GARDEN CITY, NY 11530
Page: Previous 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Last modified: September 9, 2013