The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte QIN ZHOU
____________
Appeal 2007-0039
Application 09/799,413
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: September 28, 2007
____________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,
and MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
Final Rejection of claims 1-47, which are all of the claims pending in this
application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellant invented an interactive multimedia story authoring system
and method, allowing users to create their own stories from their own
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013