Appeal No. 2007-0068
Application No. 10/230,452
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claim 11 over Wu and Kondo
Turning now to the rejection of claim 11, we find that Appellant
merely points out that the claim should be allowed because of its
dependency upon base claim 1 (Br. 14). As we discussed the teachings of
Wu with respect to claim 1, supra., we also find that the Examiner has made
a reasonable case of prima facie obviousness with respect to the combination
of Wu and Kondo. Therefore, we sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of
claim 11 over Wu and Kondo.
CONCLUSION
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner rejecting
claims 1-4, 7-10, 12-15, and 17-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and rejecting
claims 5, 6, 11, and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013